
 |
| 2008-05-09 08:52 |
| (no subject) |
| Public |
|
Looking at the WSOP schedule page I see:
$340 Nightly Tournaments, May 29 – July 15, 2008 @ 7:00 PM and
$330 Mega Satellite Tournaments, Monday – Thursday May 28 – July 1, 2008 @ 3 P.M. July 2 - 5, 2008 @ 6 P.M
Are either or both of these rebuy events? I'm guessing the satellites may be rebuy and the Nightly not?
I guess the $200+$25/rebuy supers are no longer offered.
Post A Comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend | Link
 |
| 2008-02-15 11:56 |
| This sounds right to me |
| Public |
|
Article at the CBS news web site about Condoleeza Rice as the Republican VP nominee. In a nutshell:
"Rice's presence on the ticket deprives the Democrats of the we-are-more-diverse-than-thou argument....With Rice on the ticket the Republicans are freed up to run a much stronger negative campaign against either Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama because the Secretary of State provides them with cover against charges of sexism or racism."
Rice would steal votes from women and african-american voters, two groups the democrats are expecting to win overwhelmingly. It's pretty clear that McCain doesn't like Romney and has lost patience with Huckabee, so I don't expect to see either of them on the Ticket. The main issue is whether Condi is too tainted by her association with Bush, compounding McCain's problem in that regard.
Rice for VP is at 7.0 on InTrade.
Post A Comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend | Link
 |
| 2008-02-13 14:25 |
| Summing up Roger's Steroid Testimony in Congress |
| Public |
irritated |
|
FROM CNN’s Jack Cafferty:
Let’s see, we have the subprime mess, the housing crisis, a possible recession, the war in Iraq, health care, Social Security, terrorism and this is what takes up our time – worrying about whether Roger Clemens used steroids a decade ago?
It’s good to see we have our priorities in order. A daytime made-for-tv dog and pony show put on by a bunch of irrelevant old congresspeople so they can get their faces on television. It’s no wonder a guy like Barack Obama is gaining traction.
1 Comment | Post A Comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend | Link
 |
| 2008-01-06 09:00 |
| Me Too |
| Public |
|
Presidential preferences: 90% Bill Richardson 85% Chris Dodd 84% John Edwards 83% Barack Obama 82% Joe Biden 82% Hillary Clinton 78% Mike Gravel 74% Dennis Kucinich 44% Rudy Giuliani 41% John McCain 34% Mike Huckabee 30% Mitt Romney 29% Ron Paul 27% Tom Tancredo 24% Fred Thompson
2008 Presidential Candidate Matching Quiz
Many others have done this thing too. It's generally pretty interesting how cleanly the red and blue are separated (except for Jerrod). And, for mine at least, there is a huge drop between the bottom democrat and the top republican. I take this as evidence that there are clear differences between the parties, contrary to some opinions.
Post A Comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend | Link
 |
| 2007-10-19 15:06 |
| Worried |
| Public |
|
The Absolute Poker Scandal has seriously shaken my confidence in the integrity of online poker. Apparently the cheaters at AP were absolute idiots who made no attempt to conceal what they were doing. The fact that the cheaters had inside access to software tools, which allowed the cheating, is even more worrisome.
My question is, how can we be sure this isn't happening at larger sites, like PokerStars, Party, or Full Tilt? These sites also were created by programmers, and tested extensively prior to live play, so the same kind of special accounts might also have been created. What prevents an ex-employee, or even current employee, from pulling a similar scam? If a cheater was careful, and booked maybe 60%-70% winning days, with winning days consistently larger than losing days, a huge amount could be extracted over time without ever being noticed.
I don't play in big enough games or tournaments for this to scare me off, but it would certainly give me second thoughts before moving up to higher stakes.
3 Comments | Post A Comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend | Link
 |
| 2007-10-02 21:07 |
| Blogger Tournament |
| Public |
|
Post A Comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend | Link
 |
| 2007-09-06 06:50 |
| Reception Bars |
| Public |
|

Post A Comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend | Link
 |
| 2007-07-26 17:03 |
| Review of Two Books |
| Public |
|
I just read two books by Cormac McCarthy, “No country for old men,” and “The Road.” Both excellent, but unusual. No spoilers below, but you might not want to read if you want to be totally surprised by the premise of the books.
“No country for old men” is an action-adventure story, with a number of twists. The protagonist finds $2+ million in drug money and the rest of the novel is about his efforts to escape from a Russian hit man and other parties trying to recover the money. Sounds like a familiar story, could have been written by Carl Hiaasen or Donald Westlake, but it is much, much darker. The story doesn’t turn out the way you expect. McCarthy is a great writer, and this novel might be described by the term “thriller as literature.” He has an odd style that takes some getting used to (shifting first and third person sections, an annoying lack of punctuation) but it is well worth the effort. Apparently this is being made into a movie that will be released in the fall.
“The Road” is completely different, aside from his writing style. It takes place in a post- apocalyptic nuclear winter type of setting, where a man and his son are on the road trying to reach…well, it’s never entirely clear what they are trying to reach. Life for them consists of a search for food of any kind, evading bands of cannibals, and providing comfort to each other. It is much more difficult because everything is dead (plants, animals, fish), the air is saturated with choking ash, and all the places you would think food would be (grocery stores, peoples' kitchens) have long since been stripped bare by the few survivors. I found this book to be compelling, but absolutely terrifying. If this doesn’t give you nightmares, nothing will. It was an Oprah Book club selection (which surprised the hell out of me after I read it) and also won the Pulitzer Prize for fiction and other national awards.
Post A Comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend | Link
 |
| 2006-12-13 18:53 |
| How to Pretend You are George W. Bush |
| Public |
|
I've figured out a way for a regular person to see how the Leader of the Free World feels as he tries to decide what to do in Iraq. First, drink five beers. Then, attend a graduate lecture on quantum electrodynamics (particle physics). You will understand exactly as much about particle physics as George Bush does about world politics and military strategy.
I almost feel sorry for him. He's under tremendous pressure to "do something" in Iraq to change course, and all he has available to him is different versions of rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. No matter what decision he makes, it will turn out to be wrong. I say I almost feel sorry for him, but I don't really. He got himself into this mess.
Post A Comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend | Link
 |
| 2006-11-17 21:15 |
| We have a new contender |
| Public |
|
Two weeks ago, Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld were neck-and-neck for the title of Most Hated American. With Rumsfeld fired and Cheney apparently vanished, a new contender has emerged....OJ Simpson! Tradesports should create a contract on whether this guy survives till his 60th birthday, next July 7th.
1 Comment | Post A Comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend | Link
 |
| 2006-11-10 21:38 |
| (no subject) |
| Public |
|
From Time magazine:
The Republican National Committee has been pointing out that a small shift in votes would have made a big difference. A shift of 77,611 votes would have given Republicans control of the House, according to Bush's political team. And a shift of 2,847 votes in Montana, or 7,217 votes in Virginia, or 41,537 votes in Missouri would have given a Republicans control of the Senate. In addition, the party has calculated that the winner received 51 percent or less in 35 contests, and that 23 races were decided by two percentage points or fewer, 18 races were decided by fewer than 5,000 votes, 15 races were decided by fewer than 4,000 votes, 10 races were decided by fewer than 3,000 votes, eight were decided by fewer than 2,000 votes and five races were decided by fewer than 1,000 votes.
So the Republicans almost won! I think the saying is "Figures never lie. But liars sure can figure." This is from the same team that brought you "we are winning in Iraq."
2 Comments | Post A Comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend | Link
 |
| 2006-11-10 18:05 |
| Send out the subpoenas |
| Public |
|
Since election day, gas prices are up $0.05 per gallon here in Tucson. Why? Two possibilities that I can think of:
(1) The democrats have somehow managed to screw things up already. (2) Bush-Cheney cronies in the oil industry artificially depressed prices leading up to the election, hoping to bail out their freinds.
I hope some committee or other investigates this shizzle.
Post A Comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend | Link
 |
| 2006-11-08 07:10 |
| Election thoughts |
| Public |
|
It now appears that Democrats have won both the Senate and the House. The official line is that Virginia and Montana are too close to call, but the margins are big enough in both places that the only way they could be reversed is if there was a gross error of some kind. Counting provisionals or absentees shouldn’t make a difference unless there is some reason to think those subgroups are completely different than the overall population.
Major Disappointments:
• Harold Ford Jr., who lost in Tennessee mainly due to southern racism. Hide the white women.
• Rick Santorum gave a very nice concession speech. You would think he would be angry and mortified. I wanted to see pain.
• Over 1.5 million people in Florida voted for Katherine Harris. I was hoping she would be humiliated even more thoroughly. “God selects our leaders.” Thank god he didn’t select her.
One other note: I absolutely cannot stand Hillary. And I was very impressed with the interviews John McCain gave last night. This troubles me. I just hope the Democrats are able to find any other viable candidate.
2 Comments | Post A Comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend | Link
 |
| 2006-11-02 09:56 |
| At least we won't have John Kerry to kick around anymore |
| Public |
|
There's a fairly good chance than John Kerry has cost Democrats at least a couple of house or senate seats that were in the "toss up" category. The good news is that this episode should put an end to any thoughts this jackass might have had about running for president again in 2008.
In other news, another Florida Republican heads off to rehab .
4 Comments | Post A Comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend | Link
 |
| 2006-10-20 08:02 |
| What is Google Worth? |
| Public |
|
Google just had a great earnings report, and the shares are up over $30 to above $450. But I think there are some reasons to be concerned about Google. True, net income is up over 90% from the 9 month period the prior year. But operating cash flows are up only 48%, and free cash flows (operating cash flows minus capital expenditures) are actually down 6%. The fact that operating cash flows are increasing slower than accounting earnings is a negative signal about quality of earnings (ie an increasing portion of earnings came from making accounting journal entries rather than from collecting cash) and the decrease in free cash flows indicates that it is pretty expensive to generate all this growth.
Maybe this is an anomaly and Google has spent enough on capex to put lots of excess capacity in place, so future capex will be much lower. But it really raises questions about value.
Having said that, it doesn’t take very many years of 50% growth to justify a high multiple. Right now, Google has free cash flow of $4.86 per share (annualized from the 9 month number). Google has a beta of 0.66. This is historical, and Merill Lynch (for example) adjusts it for mean reversion: (0.66 x 2/3)+0.33 = 0.77. So cost of capital is about 4%+(6% x 0.77)=8.6%, assuming a risk free rate of 4% and a market risk premium of 6%.
If free cash flows grow at 50% for the next 3 years, then at a geometric average of 10% for 20 more years, then at 5% in perpetuity, Google is worth about $800 per share (discounting the projected free cash flows at the 8.6% cost of capital). If the growth rate for the next three years is only 30%, the value drops to $525. If the geometric average is only 10% for the next 23 years, value is only $321. So the value (obviously) depends on how fast Google grows and for how long. And it’s very difficult to figure that out from data. As I said above, free cash flows are actually lower so far this year, so it’s hard to extrapolate the current growth rate.
My guess is that Google is overvalued, but not 1999 overvalued. I certainly wouldn’t buy it, but I’m not confident enough that its overvalued (or that the overvaluation will be corrected over a short time horizon) to sell it short.
Post A Comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend | Link
|